<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The WinXP TCPIP.SYS 3244 Update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/</link>
	<description>THE source for BitTorrent &#38; P2P Tips, Tricks and Info.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: raymund</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-183041</link>
		<dc:creator>raymund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-183041</guid>
		<description>Nothing succeeds like the appearance of success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing succeeds like the appearance of success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: derekguy</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>derekguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 02:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know Microsoft's motivation for updating the tcpip.sys file? Perhaps there was a reason why that value was changed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know Microsoft&#8217;s motivation for updating the tcpip.sys file? Perhaps there was a reason why that value was changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharky</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>sharky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 05:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>KIRA: - Two things:

1.  MS does so many updates on XP that it's hard to keep track of them all.  One thing I know for sure, is that they're listed sequentially (higher numbers = most recent).  This probably won't help you anyways, even if I gave you a specific update number - Why? Because MS has imposed that TCP limit on WinXP users for years now, and all newer TCPIP.SYS files have included some sort of limit (unless you use an archaic version of XP with no updates and no service pack installations).

2.  The LVLLORD patch works with any XP version of tcpip.sys.  How's that?  Simple - it doesn't just "patch" any newer versions of the file; it actually replaces it with that good ol' version 2892, and at the same time it will change the limit to whatever you want.  

Bottom line:  Use the Lvllord patch.  It works.  Just don't use it on Vista!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KIRA: - Two things:</p>
<p>1.  MS does so many updates on XP that it&#8217;s hard to keep track of them all.  One thing I know for sure, is that they&#8217;re listed sequentially (higher numbers = most recent).  This probably won&#8217;t help you anyways, even if I gave you a specific update number - Why? Because MS has imposed that TCP limit on WinXP users for years now, and all newer TCPIP.SYS files have included some sort of limit (unless you use an archaic version of XP with no updates and no service pack installations).</p>
<p>2.  The LVLLORD patch works with any XP version of tcpip.sys.  How&#8217;s that?  Simple - it doesn&#8217;t just &#8220;patch&#8221; any newer versions of the file; it actually replaces it with that good ol&#8217; version 2892, and at the same time it will change the limit to whatever you want.  </p>
<p>Bottom line:  Use the Lvllord patch.  It works.  Just don&#8217;t use it on Vista!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KiRa</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-685</link>
		<dc:creator>KiRa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-685</guid>
		<description>I fixed the problem b4 by removing an update , If any1 knows the update number....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fixed the problem b4 by removing an update , If any1 knows the update number&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: treadstone</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>treadstone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>The programme XP antispy is also able to patch the TCPIP.SYS think it's 
under the advanced tab</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The programme XP antispy is also able to patch the TCPIP.SYS think it&#8217;s<br />
under the advanced tab</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sharky</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-181</link>
		<dc:creator>sharky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-181</guid>
		<description>I saw the same results in BitComet.  When I used the EvID4226 patch, BitComet still reported "This version of TCPIP.SYS is not supported...", even though it was obviously patched, and I ran the 'patch' again to confirm the NEW limit was still valid, which it was.  I think the problem now lies in BitComet's interpretation of the new tcp version - it shouldn't be long before a new version of BitComet comes out that supports in-program changing of the TCP file (we hope!).  
My problem wasn't ONLY connected to BitTorrent speeds and the new TCPIP.SYS - but when I used BitComet AND browsed the Internet, it was the web surfing that suffered tremendous losses in speed - as pageload times were hideously slow (20+ seconds to load a page - I felt like I had a 56K modem again!) :-) 
HAUKUR - I don't have a "C:\windows\system32\dllcache" folder (just the \drivers).  The patch only patches the \drivers one (as evident by the file "TCPIP.SYS.ORIGINAL" that is created by the EvID4226 patch).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw the same results in BitComet.  When I used the EvID4226 patch, BitComet still reported &#8220;This version of TCPIP.SYS is not supported&#8230;&#8221;, even though it was obviously patched, and I ran the &#8216;patch&#8217; again to confirm the NEW limit was still valid, which it was.  I think the problem now lies in BitComet&#8217;s interpretation of the new tcp version - it shouldn&#8217;t be long before a new version of BitComet comes out that supports in-program changing of the TCP file (we hope!).<br />
My problem wasn&#8217;t ONLY connected to BitTorrent speeds and the new TCPIP.SYS - but when I used BitComet AND browsed the Internet, it was the web surfing that suffered tremendous losses in speed - as pageload times were hideously slow (20+ seconds to load a page - I felt like I had a 56K modem again!) <img src='http://filesharefreak.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
HAUKUR - I don&#8217;t have a &#8220;C:\windows\system32\dllcache&#8221; folder (just the \drivers).  The patch only patches the \drivers one (as evident by the file &#8220;TCPIP.SYS.ORIGINAL&#8221; that is created by the EvID4226 patch).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haukur</title>
		<link>http://filesharefreak.com/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Haukur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 08:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://filesharefreak.com/wordpress/2008/01/09/the-winxp-tcpipsys-3244-update/#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Hello there, fellow xp users, is anyone actively trying to crack the new tcpip.sys? Nothing excites me more than sticking it to the man.. and I do believe Microsoft, at this point, as the man and all XP users are the freedom fighters with an obligation to fight the power. I tried the Patch and Bitcomet did not accept the old driver it still shows the new version with the following: This version of TCPIP.SYS is not supported to be modified. Also the TCPIP.sys file is located both in system32\drivers and system32\dllcache, does one have to crack both cause I did.  P.S. Even though all this, I do see an increase in speed, mundo increase.. it’s almost at it’s original.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello there, fellow xp users, is anyone actively trying to crack the new tcpip.sys? Nothing excites me more than sticking it to the man.. and I do believe Microsoft, at this point, as the man and all XP users are the freedom fighters with an obligation to fight the power. I tried the Patch and Bitcomet did not accept the old driver it still shows the new version with the following: This version of TCPIP.SYS is not supported to be modified. Also the TCPIP.sys file is located both in system32\drivers and system32\dllcache, does one have to crack both cause I did.  P.S. Even though all this, I do see an increase in speed, mundo increase.. it’s almost at it’s original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
