Comments on: TCP-Z - The Best TCP/IP Patcher for All Windows OSes http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/ THE source for BitTorrent & P2P Tips, Tricks and Info. Thu, 18 Mar 2010 16:12:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2 By: Mick Russom http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-87756 Mick Russom Sat, 14 Mar 2009 03:29:37 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-87756 TO all who are questioning why lvllord style wont work easily in Vista, 64 bit anything or Windows 7. Its the signed driver bull that Microsoft is foisting. The problem is for someone to get a valid certificate to sign a driver you have to do: 1) nothing wrong according to microsoft 2) you cant touch system files 3) you get one paid for signed driver per driver build version 4) pass WHQL testing. It is expensive and obviously, since Microsoft's private keys are unknown, no one can fake it. The in-memory memory patcher is the least-worst solution available today. You could, of course, write in to MSFT and ask that they allow you to configure the operating system you paid for. Stuff like this should be illegal, and if I was President,Gates and Ballmer would simply be detained GITMO style until crap like this stops. TO all who are questioning why lvllord style wont work easily in Vista, 64 bit anything or Windows 7. Its the signed driver bull that Microsoft is foisting. The problem is for someone to get a valid certificate to sign a driver you have to do:
1) nothing wrong according to microsoft
2) you cant touch system files
3) you get one paid for signed driver per driver build version
4) pass WHQL testing.

It is expensive and obviously, since Microsoft’s private keys are unknown, no one can fake it.

The in-memory memory patcher is the least-worst solution available today.

You could, of course, write in to MSFT and ask that they allow you to configure the operating system you paid for. Stuff like this should be illegal, and if I was President,Gates and Ballmer would simply be detained GITMO style until crap like this stops.

]]> By: Anon-san http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-61897 Anon-san Fri, 09 Jan 2009 19:24:05 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-61897 I still using xp-antispy patch, much better than lvllord’s patcher you can choise the number o connections. I still using xp-antispy patch, much better than lvllord’s patcher you can choise the number o connections.

]]> By: jake http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-61302 jake Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:56:32 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-61302 This works well in vista 32 bit. I don't see this running in the background under taskmanager - processes. This works well in vista 32 bit. I don’t see this running in the background under taskmanager - processes.

]]> By: pato http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-59897 pato Sun, 04 Jan 2009 16:41:02 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-59897 VOY: Does it work for you in Vista x64? I ended up using a rescue disk. VOY: Does it work for you in Vista x64? I ended up using a rescue disk.

]]> By: ATOzTOA http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-59892 ATOzTOA Sun, 04 Jan 2009 15:40:19 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-59892 Is it safe? 100%? I have got ZoneAlarm firewall, so isn't it ok even if I hard patch? Is it safe? 100%?

I have got ZoneAlarm firewall, so isn’t it ok even if I hard patch?

]]> By: asymmetric http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-59868 asymmetric Sun, 04 Jan 2009 12:15:05 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-59868 sharky, that's installation, not implementation. otoh, i really wish you could give us some real implementation details :) sharky, that’s installation, not implementation.
otoh, i really wish you could give us some real implementation details :)

]]> By: voy http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-59858 voy Sun, 04 Jan 2009 10:36:26 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-59858 Still preferring lvllord's eventID patcher. Why have a program running in the background if patching can be done on system level. I never had any problems with the eventID patch, so why bother changing? I give it points for the GUI, but that's all. No need for another program. Still preferring lvllord’s eventID patcher. Why have a program running in the background if patching can be done on system level. I never had any problems with the eventID patch, so why bother changing?
I give it points for the GUI, but that’s all. No need for another program.

]]> By: Emil http://filesharefreak.com/2009/01/04/tcp-z-the-best-tcpip-patcher-for-all-windows-oses/#comment-59836 Emil Sun, 04 Jan 2009 07:59:24 +0000 http://filesharefreak.com/?p=1536#comment-59836 Cool patch, just what I needed. Though I have one question - Can I actually re-enable these settings (in Vista x64) after the soft patching has been done: bcdedit.exe -set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS bcdedit.exe -set TESTSIGNING ON Cool patch, just what I needed.

Though I have one question - Can I actually re-enable these settings (in Vista x64) after the soft patching has been done:

bcdedit.exe -set loadoptions DDISABLE_INTEGRITY_CHECKS
bcdedit.exe -set TESTSIGNING ON

]]>